XU Dong, CAI Yiyuan, CHEN Jiangyun. Past and Present of Implementation Science (Part Ⅱ)——Theories, Paradigm, and Characteristics[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(3): 686-693. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0025
Citation: XU Dong, CAI Yiyuan, CHEN Jiangyun. Past and Present of Implementation Science (Part Ⅱ)——Theories, Paradigm, and Characteristics[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(3): 686-693. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0025

Past and Present of Implementation Science (Part Ⅱ)——Theories, Paradigm, and Characteristics

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China 72204107

Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation 81067392

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    CHEN Jiangyun, E-mail: cjy112@i.smu.edu.cn

  • Received Date: January 11, 2024
  • Accepted Date: April 18, 2024
  • Available Online: May 13, 2024
  • Publish Date: May 12, 2024
  • Issue Publish Date: May 29, 2024
  • Implementation science has evolved over more than 20 years and established a set of theories, models, and frameworks that can be used to guide the implementation process, identify implementation-influencing factors, and evaluate implementation effectiveness. Guided by theories, the implementation research paradigm has been developed to emphasize a problem-oriented approach that seeks to solve problems, identify barriers to implementing evidence-based practices, and selectively employ implementation strategies to facilitate their adoption, implementation, and maintenance. This paradigm also gives implementation research distinctive characteristics in terms of research design, including extensive use of theories, models, and frameworks, alignment with real-world and contextual settings, use of mixed research designs, use of rapid research methods, and optimization of interventions for the context in which they are to be implemented. As the second part of Past and Present of Implementation Science, this paper provides a brief introduction to the theories, paradigms, and characteristics of implementation science.

  • [1]
    徐东, 陈江芸, 蔡毅媛. 实施科学的前世今生(上篇): 起源与发展[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2024, 15(2): 442-449. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0023

    Xu D, Chen J Y, Cai Y Y. Past and present of implementation science (part Ⅰ): origin and development[J]. Med J PUMCH, 2024, 15(2): 442-449. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0023
    [2]
    Pence B W, Gaynes B N, Udedi M, et al. Two implementation strategies to support the integration of depression screening and treatment into hypertension and diabetes care in Malawi (SHARP): parallel, cluster-randomised, controlled, implementation trial[J]. Lancet Glob Health, 2024, 12(4): e652-e661. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00592-2
    [3]
    Akiba C F, Go V, Mwapasa V, et al. The Sub-Saharan Africa Regional Partnership (SHARP) for mental health capacity building: a program protocol for building implementation science and mental health research and policymaking capacity in Malawi and Tanzania[J]. Int J Ment Health Syst, 2019, 13: 70. DOI: 10.1186/s13033-019-0327-2
    [4]
    Xu D R, Samu G C, Chen J Y. Advancing mental health service delivery in low-resource settings[J]. Lancet Glob Health, 2024, 12(4): e543-e545. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00031-7
    [5]
    Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Walker A, et al. Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2005, 58(2): 107-112. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.09.002
    [6]
    Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach[J]. Qual Saf Health Care, 2005, 14(1): 26-33. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155
    [7]
    张兰萍, 吕森森, 何文俊, 等. 实施性研究综合框架(CFIR)更新版的解析和应用[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(11): 47-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFHL202311010.htm

    Zhang L P, Lyu S S, He W J, et al. Analysis and application of the updated version of the Comprehensive Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)[J]. J Nurs, 2023, 30(11): 47-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFHL202311010.htm
    [8]
    Damschroder L J, Aron D C, Keith R E, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science[J]. Implement Sci, 2009, 4: 50. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
    [9]
    May C R, Mair F, Finch T, et al. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory[J]. Implement Sci, 2009, 4: 29. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-29
    [10]
    李春萍, 张兰萍, 王晓辉, 等. 实施理论: 常态化过程理论的解读[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 39-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFHL202405009.htm

    Li CP, Zhang LP, Wang XH, et al. Interpretation of Normalization Process Theory: a Theory of Implementation Science[J]. J Nurs, 2024, 31(5): 39-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFHL202405009.htm
    [11]
    Michie S, Van Stralen M M, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions[J]. Implement Sci, 2011, 6: 42. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
    [12]
    Moullin J C, Dickson K S, Stadnick N A, et al. Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework[J]. Implement Sci, 2019, 14(1): 1. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0842-6
    [13]
    Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda[J]. Adm Policy Ment Health, 2011, 38(2): 65-76. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
    [14]
    Glasgow R E, Vogt T M, Boles S M. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework[J]. Am J Public Health, 1999, 89(9): 1322-1327. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322
    [15]
    吕森森, 蔡毅媛, 何文俊, 等. 基于RE-AIM框架的实施结局指标制订方法[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2023, 23(6): 695-701. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZXZ202306012.htm

    Lyu S S, Cai Y Y, He W J, et al. Method of using RE-AIM framework to develop implementation outcome indicators[J]. Chin J Evid-based Med, 2023, 23(6): 695-701. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZXZ202306012.htm
    [16]
    Wang Y X, Wong E L Y, Nilsen P, et al. A scoping review of implementation science theories, models, and frameworks-an appraisal of purpose, characteristics, usability, applicability, and testability[J]. Implement Sci, 2023, 18(1): 43. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01296-x
    [17]
    Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks[J]. Implement Sci, 2015, 10: 53. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0
    [18]
    Chibanda D, Mesu P, Kajawu L, et al. Problem-solving therapy for depression and common mental disorders in Zimbabwe: piloting a task-shifting primary mental health care intervention in a population with a high prevalence of people living with HIV[J]. BMC Public Health, 2011, 11: 828. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-828
    [19]
    Hemming K, Haines T P, Chilton P J, et al. The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting[J]. BMJ, 2015, 350: h391. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h391
    [20]
    Collins L M, Nahum-Shani I, Almirall D. Optimization of behavioral dynamic treatment regimens based on the sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART)[J]. Clin Trials, 2014, 11(4): 426-434. DOI: 10.1177/1740774514536795
    [21]
    Collins L M, Murphy S A, Nair V N, et al. A strategy for optimizing and evaluating behavioral interventions[J]. Ann Behav Med, 2005, 30(1): 65-73. DOI: 10.1207/s15324796abm3001_8
    [22]
    Mody A, Filiatreau L M, Goss C W, et al. Instrumental variables for implementation science: exploring context-depend-ent causal pathways between implementation strategies and evidence-based interventions[J]. Implement Sci Commun, 2023, 4(1): 157. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00536-x
    [23]
    Dang A. Real-world evidence: a primer[J]. Pharmaceut Med, 2023, 37(1): 25-36.
    [24]
    Palinkas L A, Aarons G A, Horwitz S, et al. Mixed method designs in implementation research[J]. Adm Policy Ment Health, 2011, 38(1): 44-53. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-010-0314-z
    [25]
    Nevedal A L, Reardon C M, Opra Widerquist M A, et al. Rapid versus traditional qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)[J]. Implement Sci, 2021, 16(1): 67. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01111-5
    [26]
    Palinkas L A, Zatzick D. Rapid assessment procedure informed clinical ethnography (RAPICE) in pragmatic clinical trials of mental health services implementation: methods and applied case study[J]. Adm Policy Ment Health, 2019, 46(2): 255-270. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-018-0909-3
    [27]
    Salloum R G, Shenkman E A, Louviere J J, et al. Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engage-ment as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review[J]. Implement Sci, 2017, 12(1): 140. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0675-8
    [28]
    Salloum R G, Bishop J R, Elchynski A L, et al. Best-worst scaling methodology to evaluate constructs of the Consoli-dated Framework for Implementation Research: application to the implementation of pharmacogenetic testing for antidepressant therapy[J]. Implement Sci Commun, 2022, 3(1): 52. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00300-7
    [29]
    Sheldrick R C, Cruden G, Schaefer A J, et al. Rapid-cycle systems modeling to support evidence-informed decision-making during system-wide implementation[J]. Implement Sci Commun, 2021, 2(1): 116. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00218-6
    [30]
    De Oliveira C, Matias M A, Jacobs R. Microsimulation models on mental health: a critical review of the literature[J]. Value Health, 2024, 27(2): 226-246.
    [31]
    The Lancet Global Health. Implementing implementation science in global health[J]. Lancet Glob Health, 2023, 11(12): e1827.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 刘敏,杨金苹,赵金颜,乔建红. 老年共病患者自我感知老化、抑郁情绪与生活质量的相关性研究. 心理月刊. 2024(21): 58-60 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (966) PDF downloads (375) Cited by(1)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return
    x Close Forever Close