作者投稿
专家审稿
编辑办公
邮件订阅
RSS
-
摘要:
机器人微创化的发展一直是学科焦点, 胰十二指肠切除术因其风险高、难度大而被誉为外科手术的"珠穆朗玛峰"。标准化的手术步骤和简单易行的操作技巧有助于机器人胰十二指肠切除术(robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy, RPD)的推广应用。本文结合中国人民解放军总医院第一医学中心大量RPD实操经验, 将RPD归纳总结为18个手术步骤, 并对环血管切除技术、重建吻合技术进行要点解析, 以期推动机器人在胰腺外科的深入应用, 促进RPD规范和应用标准的进一步建立。
Abstract:The development of minimally invasive robotic surgery has always been the focus of the discipline. Pancreaticoduodenectomy has been regarded as the "Mount Everest" of surgical operations because of its high risk and mounting difficulty. Standardized surgical steps and easy-to-follow operation techniques are helpful to promote the application of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD). Therefore, in this paper, we summarize the RPD to form an 18-step surgery procedure and analyze the key points of circumferential vessel resection and reconstructive anastomosis techniques, based on the experience of RPD at the First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, with the hope of promoting the in-depth application of robotics in pancreatic surgery and furthering the establishment of RPD application standards.
-
经过一天烈日的炙烤，住院部外面的地表温度已经高达40 ℃，进进出出需要加强监护的患者还在不断增加，面对监护室内堆积如山的病患，大家的心情已经烦躁不安。高速周转的病房似乎又经历了一波“大洗牌”，病床上躺着不同的面孔，交班正仔细且有序地进行着。“号外……又有新病人要从急诊科转入，目前鼻导管10 L/min吸氧中，呼吸困难，需要重新评估插管指征......”值班护士小罗一边接听着电话，一边冲大家喊道。此刻空气仿佛凝住了一般，最尴尬的事情莫过如此——在交班时要来病人。“大家先交班，速战速决，准备收病人......”作为今天当值的高年资主治医师，我立刻说道。
伴随着转运车的声音，病人送来了，大家立刻围了上去，按照平时标准动作过床、吸氧、完成心电监护连接。我走到病床边，那是一位白发苍苍、胸前皮下还隐约有一枚“勋章”的爷爷，一看心电监护，我本能地反应那枚东西应该是心脏永久起搏器。为了判断病人意识及症状，我拍了拍老人肩膀，问道：“爷爷，您知道这是在哪儿吗？”老人没有回答，但是眼睛在不停地转动，嘴巴似乎要表达什么，带着一点儿北方口音，但听得不太清楚。我瞬时像明白了什么，于是俯下身去对着他的耳朵大声喊道：“爷爷，您知道这是在哪儿吗？您是不是听得不太清楚？”老人摇了摇头，又点了点头。
此时，我身旁一位经验丰富的“老医生”冲我扬了扬手中的听诊器听筒，我第一反应是她要听诊，于是连忙说道：“我来吧。”但她却直接把听头给爷爷戴上了，并对着听筒大声说道：“老爷子，这样能听清吗？”老人喃喃地回答：“听清了，听清了……”慢慢地，他紧崩的神情似乎也逐渐舒展开来。经过一系列问诊和针对性的处理后，爷爷慢慢睡着了。
病人急性呼吸窘迫的病因尚未完全明确，依然有病情随时加重的危险，依照惯例，我们立即联系家属了解老人的病史并进行谈话签字。通过与家属充分沟通，我们了解到了爷爷的慢性病史以及本次发病的诱因，还得知爷爷听力不好，这几天辗转各大医院，一直没休息好，病情也越来越重了。好在经过我们悉心的治疗和照顾，两周后爷爷终于出院了！
门诊复诊时，我看到爷爷耳朵上多了一副助听器，便打趣道：“爷爷，现在声音清楚多了吧？”爷爷笑着回答：“这玩意儿还是没有你们给我戴的东西听得清楚。”我和家属听完都哈哈大笑起来……
后记
听诊器的发明已有近200年的历史，其除了可以帮助医生完成重要的听诊检查外，在某些情况下还可以成为与病人沟通的桥梁。从法国医生雷奈克为了诊治患者，第一次提出“听诊器”的概念，到吴孟超院士在冬天查房时先用双手捂热听诊器再为患者听诊，再到为了能让患者听清楚，发现听诊器的新用途……不同听诊器的故事中，有不同的主人公以及不同的场景，但伴随的都是那份来自医生的爱，那份给予患者温暖的爱。病人与医生之间的第一步，是沟通，是了解，但病人在任何时候和任何状态下，都一定是需要帮助的那个人。任何人在面对身体的病痛时，或是因为没有足够专业的知识，或是因为疾病带来的切肤之痛，无论是酸胀、麻木、疼痛、无力，还是其他任何一种异样的感觉，都会让其内心产生对于异常表现的无限猜测以及随之而来的焦虑、恐慌。初入医学院时的我，心里想的只是如何掌握高精尖的各种医学技术，如何把病看好。进入医院工作多年以后，特别是在经历新型冠状病毒感染疫情后，我深切地体会到，不管医生的技术有多精湛，医疗水平有多高超，医生的关怀和援助永远都是病人最坚实的情感堡垒。治病一定是依靠科学，但让病人感觉到舒服却更需要医生对于患者那颗帮助的心。从医和患这层关系构建起来的那一刻起，他们就不该是对立的，而是共生的，更是共情的，感同身受、同气连枝才是医治疾病的起点，更是每一个合格医生毕生追求的终点。
临床医生正如其名字一样，需要站在床边仔细观察病人。观察的目的除正确诊断病情外，更重要的是察觉病人最需要的帮助是什么。故事中的老人一直处于听不清周围声音的状态，这时候病人可能会感到恐惧与烦躁，甚至会导致病情恶化，而一次仔细的观察就能够使问题迎刃而解。一个小小的听诊器，以及听诊器带来的这份“逆向思维”，彰显的不仅是一种临床采集病史的技巧，更是医生把心打开，试图去侧耳倾听病人诉说的耐心，以及尽其所能去关爱病人的慈悲。
因此，听诊器的故事，讲述的不是一种疾病的诊断，更不是一个病例的转归，听诊器联通的亦非症状与诊断，心跳与鼓膜，而是受伤的心和呵护的手，告诉我你哪里不舒服，我一定会想办法听到你的诉说，也一定会陪着你直到疾病消散。把痛苦告诉我，把希望传给你，这才是听诊器的真正意义所在，才是医生和病人最正确的相处方式。一如美国医生特鲁多对医生这个职业的经典描述——有时是治愈，常常是帮助，总是去安慰！
作者贡献：张天辰、张修平负责论文撰写；刘荣负责论文构思及修订。利益冲突：所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突 -
![]()
图 2 “301”式胰肠吻合示意图[21]
A. 8字或U型缝合胰腺断端全层；B. 胰腺断端全层对空肠浆肌层，单层连续缝合；C. 收紧缝线打结
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of "301" pancreaticojejunostomy[21]
A. 8-shaped or U-shaped suturing of the entire pancreatic stump layer; B. pancreatic stump full layer to jejunal seromuscular layer, single layer continuous suture; C. tighten the stitching and tie a knot
-
[1] Siegel R L, Miller K D, Wagle N S, et al. Cancer statistics, 2023[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2023, 73(1): 17-48. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21763
[2] Park W, Chawla A, O'Reilly E M. Pancreatic cancer: a review[J]. JAMA, 2021, 326(9): 851-862. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.13027
[3] 刘荣, 赵国栋. LR式机器人胰十二指肠切除术手术方法建立和技术优化[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 9(4): 193-195. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2016.04.001 Liu R, Zhao G D. Study on reflux esophagitis correlation with body mass index risk factors[J]. Chin J Laparosc Surg(Electron Ed), 2016, 9(4): 193-195. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2016.04.001
[4] Melvin W S, Needleman B J, Krause K R, et al. Robotic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2003, 13(1): 33-36. DOI: 10.1089/109264203321235449
[5] Zureikat A H, Beane J D, Zenati M S, et al. 500 Minimally invasive robotic pancreatoduodenectomies: one decade of optimizing performance[J]. Ann Surg, 2021, 273(5): 966-972. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003550
[6] Shi Y S, Wang W S, Qiu W H, et al. Learning curve from 450 cases of robot-assisted pancreaticoduocectomy in a high-volume pancreatic center: optimization of operative proce-dure and a retrospective study[J]. Ann Surg, 2021, 274(6): e1277-e1283. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003664
[7] Zeh H J, Zureikat A H, Secrest A, et al. Outcomes after robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary lesions[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012, 19(3): 864-870. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-2045-0
[8] Zhang T, Zhao Z M, Gao Y X, et al. The learning curve for a surgeon in robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a high-volume pancreatic center[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(9): 2927-2933. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6595-0
[9] Boone B A, Zenati M, Hogg M E, et al. Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve[J]. JAMA Surg, 2015, 150(5): 416-422. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.17
[10] Liu R, Zhang T, Zhao Z M, et al. The surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms: a comparative study of a single center[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(6): 2380-2386. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5238-6
[11] Liu Q, Zhao Z M, Zhang X P, et al. Perioperative and oncological outcomes of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in low-risk surgical candidates: a multicenter propensity score-matched study[J]. Ann Surg, 2023, 277(4): e864-e871. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005160
[12] Zhang X P, Xu S, Zhao Z M, et al. Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy following learning curves of surgeons: a multicenter study on 2255 patients[J/OL]. Ann Surg, 2023, Dec 11. doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006167.
[13] Zhang X P, Xu S, Zhao Z M, et al. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: analysis of surgical outcomes and long-term prognosis in a high-volume center[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2023, 22(2): 140-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.09.006
[14] Wang W, Liu Q, Zhao Z M, et al. Comparison of robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy for primary nonampullary duodenal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2022, 407(1): 167-173. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02303-9
[15] Xu S, Zhang X P, Zhao G D, et al. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score-matched study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(11): 8237-8248. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09271-1
[16] Liu Q, Jiang N, Tian E Y, et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study[J]. Int J Surg, 2022, 104: 106819. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106819
[17] Liu Q, Li M Y, Gao Y X, et al. Effect of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy on postoperative length of hospital stay and complications for pancreatic head or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2024, 9(5): 428-437. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00005-0
[18] Liu R, Abu Hilal M, Besselink M G, et al. International consensus guidelines on robotic pancreatic surgery in 2023[J]. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr, 2024, 13(1): 89-104. DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-23-132
[19] Giulianotti P C, Mangano A, Bustos R E, et al. Educational step-by-step surgical video about operative technique in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) at University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC): 17 steps standardized technique-lessons learned since the first worldwide RPD performed in the year 2001[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(6): 2758-2762. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07383-0
[20] 赵国栋, 刘荣. 机器人肝胆胰手术Trocar布置方法的教学与实践[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(3): 166-171. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2018.03.015 Zhao G D, Liu R. Teaching and clinic application of trocar placement in the robotic hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery[J]. Chin J Laparosc Surg (Electron Ed), 2018, 11(3): 166-171. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2018.03.015
[21] 刘荣, 赵之明, 姜楠. 胰肠吻合的历史发展及"301" 式胰肠吻合的变迁[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(1): 1-4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQJW202001002.htm Liu R, Zhao Z M, Jiang N. History of pancreaticoje-junostomy and historical changes in 301-style pancreaticojejunostomy[J]. Chin J Laparosc Surg (Electron Ed), 2020, 13(1): 1-4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQJW202001002.htm
[22] 刘荣, 王子政. 微创胰腺手术的技术难题与对策[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2019, 24(3): 169-171. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FQJW201903004.htm Liu R, Wang Zi Z. Technical difficulties and counter-measures of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery[J]. J Laparosc Surg, 2019, 24(3): 169-171. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FQJW201903004.htm
[23] Yeo C J, Cameron J L, Sohn T A, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: comparison of morbidity and mortality and short-term outcome[J]. Ann Surg, 1999, 229(5): 613. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199905000-00003
[24] Hackert T, Werner J, Weitz J, et al. Uncinate process first--a novel approach for pancreatic head resection[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2010, 395(8): 1161-1164. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-010-0663-9
[25] Pessaux P, Rosso E, Panaro F, et al. Preliminary experience with the hanging maneuver for pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2009, 35(9): 1006-1010. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.04.009
[26] Kawai M, Hirano S, Yamaue H. Artery-first approach for pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2018, 25(6): 319-320. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.554
[27] 刘荣, 刘渠. 肝胆胰外科应努力达到"四标"[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2022, 102(18): 1323-1325. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20220129-00219 Liu R, Liu Q. Hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery should strive to achieve the "Four Standards"[J]. Natl Med J China, 2022, 102(18): 1323-1325. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20220129-00219
[28] 刘荣, 尹注增. 环血管技术在胰腺微创手术中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2023, 38(7): 537-539. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113855-20230518-00255 Liu R, Yin Z Z. The application of circular vascular technology in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery[J]. Chin J Gen Surg, 2023, 38(7): 537-539. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113855-20230518-00255
[29] 刘荣, 刘渠, 赵国栋, 等. 环血管技术在胰十二指肠切除术中的应用[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2022, 43(11): 1109-1112. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2022.11.001 Liu R, Liu Q, Zhao G D, et al. Application of circumvascular technique in pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Acad J Chin PLA Med Sch, 2022, 43(11): 1109-1112. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2022.11.001
[30] 刘荣, 刘渠. 机器人肝胆胰手术的切除与重建[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2023, 14(6): 1125-1130. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0380 Liu R, Liu Q. Resection and reconstruction of robotic hepatopancreatobiliary surgery[J]. Med J PUMCH, 2023, 14(6): 1125-1130. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0380
[31] Tran K, Van Eijck C, Di Carlo V, et al. Occlusion of the pancreatic duct versus pancreaticojejunostomy: a prospective randomized trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2002, 236(4): 422-428. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00004
[32] Cheng Y, Briarava M, Lai M L, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 9(9): CD012257.
[33] 卫强, 叶茜薇, 徐骁, 等. 胰十二指肠切除后胰腺残端与消化道吻合方式研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2018, 33(6): 527-530. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-631X.2018.06.029 Wei Q, Ye Q W, Xu X, et al. Research progress on the anastomosis method between pancreatic stump and digestive tract after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Chin J Gen Surg, 2018, 33(6): 527-530. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-631X.2018.06.029
[34] Kakita A, Yoshida M, Takahashi T. History of pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy: development of a more reliable anastomosis technique[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2001, 8(3): 230-237. DOI: 10.1007/s005340170022
[35] VARCO R L. A method of implanting the pancreatic duct into the jejunum in the Whipple operation for carcinoma of the pancreas; case report[J]. Surgery, 1945, 18: 569-573.
[36] Halloran C M, Platt K, Gerard A, et al. PANasta trial; Cattell Warren versus Blumgart techniques of panreatico-jejunostomy following pancreato-duodenectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2016, 17: 30. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-1144-9
[37] 刘荣, 刘渠, 赵之明, 等. 单针全层胰肠吻合(301式) 在胰十二指肠切除术中的应用[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2018, 23(11): 854-857. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FQJW201811012.htm Liu R, Liu Q, Zhao Z M, et al. Application of a novel technique of pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. J Laparosc Surg, 2018, 23(11): 854-857. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FQJW201811012.htm
[38] Liu Q, Zhao Z M, Gao Y X, et al. Novel single-layer continuous suture of pancreaticojejunostomy for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2020, 27(2): 56-63. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.682
[39] Liu Q, Zhao Z M, Gao Y X, et al. Novel technique for single-layer pancreatojejunostomy is not inferior to modified blumgart anastomosis in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: results of a randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2021, 28(4): 2346-2355. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09204-z
[40] Wang C Y, Huang T S, Zhang K D, et al. Retrocolic versus antecolic gastrointestinal reconstruction in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2019, 26(11): 517-523. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.670
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 1635
- HTML全文浏览量: 172
- PDF下载量: 50
