Evaluating chromosomal segregation in a family where both spouses carry an autosomal translocation
Irina L. Puppo
Ziravard N. Tonyan
Alsu F. Saifitdinova
Julia A. Loginova
Anna A. Kinunen
Alisa N. Panina
Julia R. Pastuhova
Olga A. Leonteva
Olga G. Chiryaeva
Olga V. Malysheva
Oleg S. Glotov
Irina V. Poliakova
Andrey V. Tikhonov
Tatyana V. Vavilova
Irina L. Menshikova
Elvira V. Isakova
Andrey S. Glotov
Natalya K. Bichevaya
作者及单位信息
·
DOI:10.1097/RD9.0000000000000041
73
1
0
0
0
0
扫描转手机阅读
下载中华医学期刊APP阅读更流畅 体验更丰富
PDF下载
APP内阅读
ABSTRACT
Autosomal reciprocal translocations represent exchanges of chromatin fragments between non-homologous chromosomes. Translocations are facilitated by the creation of quadrivalent structures during the first meiotic division, which are characterized by the length of the translocated and centric segments, asymmetry, and the presence of terminal breakpoints, all of which may impact segregation mode. Here, we report a rare case of multiple reciprocal translocations within a single family. This includes the evaluation of the translocations in each of the spouses and an analysis of their chromosome segregation patterns as determined by the constellation of universal characteristics in each of their quadrivalents. The obtained results will be of interest to fundamental biology, as they will expand the understanding of the factors affecting chromosome segregation during meiosis.
I.L.P., Z.N.T., and A.N.P. designed the study, analyzed the data, and prepared the manuscript. A.A.K. analyzed the data and prepared the manuscript. A.F.S., Y.A.L., J.R.P., O.A.L., O.G.C., O.V.M., O.S.G., I.V.P., A.V.T., A.S.G., and N.K.B. performed laboratory studies, reviewed, and modified the manuscript. I.L.M. and E.V.I. performed clinical research, reviewed, and modified the manuscript. T.V.V. critically reviewed and modified the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.
引用本文
Irina L. Puppo,Ziravard N. Tonyan,Alsu F. Saifitdinova,et al. Evaluating chromosomal segregation in a family where both spouses carry an autosomal translocation[J]. Reprod Dev Med,2023,07(03):189-192.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
Introduction
The term autosomal reciprocal translocation (ART) is applied to chromosomal rearrangement involving the exchange of chromatin fragments between non-homologous chromosomes. Universal characteristics of ARTs include quadrivalent asymmetry, the presence of terminal breakpoints, and the length of translocated (TS) and centric segments (CS). In addition, participation in a translocation of chromosome 9 and acrocentric autosomes are known to affect pathological meiotic segregation mode[
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
].
Here, we describe a rare case of a family in which both parents carry independently acquired ARTs. We performed chromosome segregation analysis in both the sperm and blastomeres depending on the universal characteristics of the ARTs. These data were then evaluated and discussed in the context of their applicability for genetic counseling and the prediction of reproductive outcomes in such couples based on both translocation feature and the carrier’s gender.
Case presentation
A non-consanguineous couple with a 2-year history of infertility, asthenozoospermia in the male, obesity in the female, and without other phenotypic features was referred to the International Centre for Reproductive Medicine for the first time in 2014, when the female was 28 and the male was 36 years of age. Karyotype analysis of each spouse revealed that both present with unique ARTs: 46,XY,t(3;6)(p22.2;p21.2) and 46,XX,t(2;17)(p16.1;p12) (
Fig. 1A and B
).
Karyograms (upper row) and examples of the PGT-SR results (middle and bottom rows). Karyograms (upper row) describing the karyotypes of the peripheral lymphocytes from the mother (A), father (B), and son (C) as evaluated by the QFH/Ac D (A, B) and GTG (C) banding techniques. Schematic describing the composition of each hybridization mixture (middle row) for FISH-based PGT-SR evaluations. Hybridization mix 1 labeled the following chromosome segments: the TS (TEL 3p green) and CS (LSI BCL6 3q27 orange/green) from chromosome 3, and the CS of chromosome 6 (LSI 6q23 aqua) and produced 2 aqua (2×CS6), 2 orange/green (2×CS3), and 1 green signal (1×TS3) following the first round of FISH. Hybridization mix 2 labeled the following chromosome segments: the CS of chromosome 17 (CEP 17 aqua), and the CS (CEP 2 orange) and TS (LSI ALK 2p23 orange/green) of chromosome 2 producing 2 aqua (2×CS17), 3 orange/green (3×TS2), and 2 orange signals (2×CS2) following the second round of FISH. Hybridization mix 3 labeled chromosome segments: CS (CEP 17 aqua) and TS (LSI17p13.1 orange) from chromosome 17, and the TS (TEL 6p green) of chromosome 6 ultimately producing 2 aqua (2×CS17), 1 orange (1×TS17), and 3 green (3×TS6) signals following the third round of FISH. Ultimately producing the following signals: TS3 × 1+TS6 × 3+CS3 × 2+CS6 × 2 and TS2 × 3+TS17 × 1+CS2 × 2+CS17 × 2 indicating adjacent-1 chromosomal segregation in both translocations. Finally, hybridization mix 4 was designed to label an additional seven chromosomes which do not participate in translocations in this family. These include the following labels: CEP 16 aqua; CEP 18 blue; LSI 21q22 green; LSI 22q11.2 orange; CEP X orange/green; CEP Y (satIII) orange/ aqua. This final reaction produced two signals from each probe, except chromosome 21 which presents with a replicated signal, and labeled the X and Y chromosomes with one orange/green (X) and orange/ aqua (Y) signal each. Finally the bottom row shows one of the results of our PGT-SR evaluations using aCGH which show following profile: arr(2p25.3p16.1)x3,(3p26.3p22.2)x3,(6p25.3p21.2)x1,(17p13.3p12)x1 confirming an adjacent-1 segregation mode for both translocations.
Couple then underwent 7 years (2014–2020) of treatment including 6 cycles of in vitro fertilization or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection and 3 balanced embryo transfers following PGT-SR evaluation by fluorescent in situ hybridization or array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), resulting in a single pregnancy and the birth of a healthy son. Both spouses refused prenatal karyotyping and karyotype analysis of their son after birth revealed his inheritance of the maternal translocation: 46,XY,t(2;17)(p16.1;p12)mat (
Fig. 1C
).
Quadrivalent characterization
Estimation of the length of both the TS and CS, the sum of these lengths, and their ratio allows us to predict that the most likely pathological segregation mode for both translocations is adjacent-1 (
Supplementary Table 1
; http://links.lww.com/RDM/A8).
The female t(2;17) contributes to the formation of a severe asymmetric quadrivalent, while translocation in the male t(3;6) to a mild asymmetric quadrivalent. Both translocations have no terminal breakpoints (
Supplementary Table 2
; http://links.lww.com/RDM/A8).
Chromosome segregation analysis in blastomeres, trophectoderm, and sperm
Our evaluations identified an alternate mode of segregation in 41.7% of the embryos regardless of translocation. Adjacent-1 was the predominant pathological mode of segregation in both translocations (33.3% in female and 29.2% in male), followed by 3:1 (12.5%) and adjacent-2 (4.2%) in the female, and adjacent-2 (12.5%) and 3:1 (8.3%) in the male. In addition, we could not define the segregation type in 2 embryos when evaluating the male translocation and two embryos in the female translocation ( "other" type of segregation; 8.3% in both) owing to inconsistencies in the number of fluorescent signals or chromosome content specific to a particular segregation mode. Examples of the PGT-SR results are shown in
Figure 1
.
The most common segregation mode in the sperm was alternate (40.6%). The prevalent pathological segregation type was adjacent-1 (35.3%). Segregation of 3:1 and adjacent-2 were detected in 18.8% and 5.3% of the sperm nuclei, respectively.
Discussion
ART carriers are at an increased risk of infertility, recurrent miscarriage, and chromosomally abnormal offspring due to pathological chromosome segregation during gametogenesis. Effective genetic counseling combines empirical data and segregation analysis to determine the probability of having an offspring with an unbalanced karyotype or experiencing a miscarriage. However, the empirical data describing the risks for families in which both partners are ART carriers is extremely limited. This is further complicated by the fact that ARTs are not recurrent, making the application of broader empirical data difficult. In addition, comprehensive segregation analysis requires the investigation of extended pedigrees which must include various family members with known karyotypes, making these evaluations largely impractical. However, the use of universal ART characteristics (length of TS and CS, quadrivalent asymmetry, presence of terminal breakpoints) can provide additional insight into these translocations and may be useful in genetic counseling and more broadly applied.
Alternate segregation type is frequent in ART carriers. Its high incidence can be explained, at least in part, in male carriers by the lack of complete maturation of unbalanced gametes due to failure of the spermatozoa to pass the spermatogenesis checkpoints[
1
,
5
]. Analysis of chromosome segregation patterns in both the sperm and embryos for male translocation in our case also showed an alternate segregation mode as common.
Alternate segregation is significantly less frequent in ART carriers with severe asymmetric quadrivalents or with terminal breakpoints when compared to those with mild asymmetric quadrivalents or without terminal breakpoints. In contrast, the 3:1 mode is more common in severe asymmetric quadrivalents[
3
,
4
]. Here, we noted that the female ART presented with severe quadrivalent asymmetry while the male translocation induced only mild quadrivalent asymmetry, both rearrangements were without terminal breakpoints. The predominant pathological type was found to be adjacent-1 for both translocations when predicted using both the TS and CS lengths. We detected 3:1 segregation in 12.5% of female ART embryos compared to 8.3% in male ART embryos, but the differences were not significant. However, despite the lack of significance, this observation is consistent with our evaluation of severe quadrivalent asymmetry in the female ART inducting pathological meiotic disjunctions.
The inheritance of a maternal translocation by a son requires investigation of the possible effect of this translocation on his reproductive potential not only due to the formation of the severe asymmetric quadrivalent but also to the localization of breakpoints. One of the breakpoints is located in 17p12 fragile site, but it is known that homozygosity at the 17p12 does not affect reproductive function[
6
]. However, an investigation of the frequency and origin of segmental aneuploidy in human oocytes and pre-implantation embryos revealed that some chromosome breakpoints tend to occur within known fragile sites[
7
]. Even though most segmental aneuploidies are of mitotic origin, it is not known as to how the initial presence of a breakpoint in any of the fragile sites in a translocation carrier influences the processes of double-stranded breakage and reunion during crossing-over in spermatogenesis, in which, unlike oogenesis, there is an inefficient repair of DNA damage[
8
].
As for the second breakpoint in the female translocation, there is no evidence that any of the genes located in the 2p16.1 region affect fertility. Furthermore, it is known that the FSHR gene does not affect sperm count[
9
]. CCDC85A has been associated with female fertility in some studies, but the effect on the male reproductive system has not been evaluated[
10
].
In addition, polymorphisms and copy number variation of the EFEMP1 gene, located at 2p16.1, have been associated with abdominal obesity[
11
], which may explain the presence of obesity in the female partner.
PGT-SR is a necessary and urgent measure for most families in which both spouses are ART carriers, as this technique can help them have a healthy baby[
12
,
13
,
14
]. The lack of empirical data, as well as the complexity of segregation analysis, require additional tools for risk assessment in families with double translocations. Estimations of the theoretically predicted type of pathological chromosome segregation, the presence of terminal breakpoints, the asymmetry degree and segregation mode in the sperm are all likely to be useful during genetic counseling. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to describe the universal characteristics of ARTs in a family with 2 different translocations. Even though these parameters are informative for families with one ART, it is still premature to draw any conclusions around their application in double translocation families. Thus far, the available data suggests that it may be possible to advise these families on the use of a sperm or egg donor in the case of severe quadrivalent asymmetry, advanced maternal age and multiple unsuccessful attempts to obtain embryos with a balanced karyotype. At the same time, considering the frequency of alternate segregation and the limited empirical data available regarding such exceptionally rare cases, it is necessary to precisely assess the risks for each individual family to support their pursuit of a healthy offspring without the use of donor gametes, as in this case.
Jalbert P , Sele B , Jalbert H . Reciprocal translocations: a way to predict the mode of imbalanced segregation by pachytene-diagram drawing. Hum Genet 1980;55(2):209–222. doi:
10.1007/BF00291769
.
Ye Y , Quian Y , Xu C , et al. Meiotic segregation analysis of embryos from reciprocal translocation carriers in PGD cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2012;24(1):83–90. doi:
10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.08.012
.
Anton E , Vidal F , Blanco J . Role of sperm FISH studies in the genetic reproductive advice of structural reorganization carriers. Hum Reprod 2007;22(8):2088–2092. doi:
10.1093/humrep/dem152
.
Babariya D , Fragouli E , Alfarawati S , et al. The incidence and origin of segmental aneuploidy in human oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod 2017;32(12):549–2560. doi:
10.1093/humrep/dex324
.
Zhang X , Zhang H , Hu C , et al. Clinical features of carriers of reciprocal chromosomal translocations involving chromosome 2: report of nine cases and review of the literature. Int Braz J Urol 2018;44(4):785-793. doi:
10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0233
.
Elks CE , Perry JR , Sulem P , et al. Thirty new loci for age at menarche identified by a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 2010;42(12):1077–1085. doi:
10.1038/ng.714
.
Wen W , Kato N , Hwang JY , et al. Genome-wide association studies in East Asians identify new loci for waist-hip ratio and waist circumference. Sci Rep 2016;6:17958. doi:
10.1038/srep17958
.
Beyazyurek C , Ekmekci CG , Sağlam Y , et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for extremes--successful birth after PGD for a consanguineous couple carrying an identical balanced reciprocal translocation. Fertil Steril 2010;93(7):2413.e1–2413.e5. doi:
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.032
.
Huang C , Jiang W , Zhu Y , et al. Pregnancy outcomes of reciprocal translocation carriers with two or more unfavorable pregnancy histories: before and after preimplantation genetic testing. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019;36(11):2325–2331. doi:
10.1007/s10815-019-01585-9
.
Liu D , Chen C , Zhang X , et al. Successful birth after preimplantation genetic testing for a couple with two different reciprocal translocations and review of the literature. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2021;19(1):1–9. doi:
10.1186/s12958-021-00731-2
.
Irina L. Puppo, International Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Saint-Petersburg 197350, Russia. E-mail: ur.deftsabilavomifort_li.
B
I.L.P., Z.N.T., and A.N.P. designed the study, analyzed the data, and prepared the manuscript. A.A.K. analyzed the data and prepared the manuscript. A.F.S., Y.A.L., J.R.P., O.A.L., O.G.C., O.V.M., O.S.G., I.V.P., A.V.T., A.S.G., and N.K.B. performed laboratory studies, reviewed, and modified the manuscript. I.L.M. and E.V.I. performed clinical research, reviewed, and modified the manuscript. T.V.V. critically reviewed and modified the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.
C
We are grateful to the Chairman of the Russian Association for Human Reproduction, Prof. V. S. Korsak for their active support around the development and implementation of advanced pre-implantation genetic testing in Russia.
D
All authors declare no conflicts of interest.
E
All procedures were performed in accordance with The Declaration of Helsinki and the overall study was approved by the Almazov National Medical Research Center institutional ethics committee (no. 02-21 from February 15, 2021). Each participant also provided written informed consent.
F
Puppo IL, Tonyan ZN, Saifitdinova AF, Loginova JA, Kinunen AA, Panina AN, Pastuhova JR, Leonteva OA, Chiryaeva OG, Malysheva OV, Glotov OS, Poliakova IV, Tikhonov AV, Vavilova TV, Menshikova IL, Isakova EV, Glotov AS, Bichevaya NK. Evaluating chromosomal segregation in a family where both spouses carry an autosomal translocation. Reprod Dev Med 2023;7(3):189–192. doi: 10.1097/RD9.0000000000000041
G
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russian Federation(project "Multicenter research bioresource collection "Human Reproductive Health" contract No 075-15-2021-1058 from September 28, 2021)
评论(0条)
注册登录
时间排序
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
最新推荐
更多
A review of pre-implantation genetic testing technologies and applications
Ren-Qian Du 等生殖与发育医学(英文) 2023,07(01)
Character of cell-free genomic DNA in embryo culture medium and the prospect of its clinical application in preimplantation genetic testing