XU Dong, CAI Yiyuan, CHEN Jiangyun. Past and Present of Implementation Science (Part Ⅱ)——Theories, Paradigm, and Characteristics[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(3): 686-693. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0025
Citation: XU Dong, CAI Yiyuan, CHEN Jiangyun. Past and Present of Implementation Science (Part Ⅱ)——Theories, Paradigm, and Characteristics[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(3): 686-693. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0025

Past and Present of Implementation Science (Part Ⅱ)——Theories, Paradigm, and Characteristics

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China 72204107

Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation 81067392

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    CHEN Jiangyun, E-mail: cjy112@i.smu.edu.cn

  • Received Date: January 11, 2024
  • Accepted Date: April 18, 2024
  • Available Online: May 13, 2024
  • Publish Date: May 12, 2024
  • Issue Publish Date: May 29, 2024
  • Implementation science has evolved over more than 20 years and established a set of theories, models, and frameworks that can be used to guide the implementation process, identify implementation-influencing factors, and evaluate implementation effectiveness. Guided by theories, the implementation research paradigm has been developed to emphasize a problem-oriented approach that seeks to solve problems, identify barriers to implementing evidence-based practices, and selectively employ implementation strategies to facilitate their adoption, implementation, and maintenance. This paradigm also gives implementation research distinctive characteristics in terms of research design, including extensive use of theories, models, and frameworks, alignment with real-world and contextual settings, use of mixed research designs, use of rapid research methods, and optimization of interventions for the context in which they are to be implemented. As the second part of Past and Present of Implementation Science, this paper provides a brief introduction to the theories, paradigms, and characteristics of implementation science.

  • [1]
    徐东, 陈江芸, 蔡毅媛. 实施科学的前世今生(上篇): 起源与发展[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2024, 15(2): 442-449. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0023

    Xu D, Chen J Y, Cai Y Y. Past and present of implementation science (part Ⅰ): origin and development[J]. Med J PUMCH, 2024, 15(2): 442-449. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0023
    [2]
    Pence B W, Gaynes B N, Udedi M, et al. Two implementation strategies to support the integration of depression screening and treatment into hypertension and diabetes care in Malawi (SHARP): parallel, cluster-randomised, controlled, implementation trial[J]. Lancet Glob Health, 2024, 12(4): e652-e661. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00592-2
    [3]
    Akiba C F, Go V, Mwapasa V, et al. The Sub-Saharan Africa Regional Partnership (SHARP) for mental health capacity building: a program protocol for building implementation science and mental health research and policymaking capacity in Malawi and Tanzania[J]. Int J Ment Health Syst, 2019, 13: 70. DOI: 10.1186/s13033-019-0327-2
    [4]
    Xu D R, Samu G C, Chen J Y. Advancing mental health service delivery in low-resource settings[J]. Lancet Glob Health, 2024, 12(4): e543-e545. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00031-7
    [5]
    Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Walker A, et al. Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2005, 58(2): 107-112. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.09.002
    [6]
    Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach[J]. Qual Saf Health Care, 2005, 14(1): 26-33. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155
    [7]
    张兰萍, 吕森森, 何文俊, 等. 实施性研究综合框架(CFIR)更新版的解析和应用[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(11): 47-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFHL202311010.htm

    Zhang L P, Lyu S S, He W J, et al. Analysis and application of the updated version of the Comprehensive Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)[J]. J Nurs, 2023, 30(11): 47-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFHL202311010.htm
    [8]
    Damschroder L J, Aron D C, Keith R E, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science[J]. Implement Sci, 2009, 4: 50. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
    [9]
    May C R, Mair F, Finch T, et al. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory[J]. Implement Sci, 2009, 4: 29. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-29
    [10]
    李春萍, 张兰萍, 王晓辉, 等. 实施理论: 常态化过程理论的解读[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 39-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFHL202405009.htm

    Li CP, Zhang LP, Wang XH, et al. Interpretation of Normalization Process Theory: a Theory of Implementation Science[J]. J Nurs, 2024, 31(5): 39-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFHL202405009.htm
    [11]
    Michie S, Van Stralen M M, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions[J]. Implement Sci, 2011, 6: 42. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
    [12]
    Moullin J C, Dickson K S, Stadnick N A, et al. Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework[J]. Implement Sci, 2019, 14(1): 1. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0842-6
    [13]
    Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda[J]. Adm Policy Ment Health, 2011, 38(2): 65-76. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
    [14]
    Glasgow R E, Vogt T M, Boles S M. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework[J]. Am J Public Health, 1999, 89(9): 1322-1327. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322
    [15]
    吕森森, 蔡毅媛, 何文俊, 等. 基于RE-AIM框架的实施结局指标制订方法[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2023, 23(6): 695-701. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZXZ202306012.htm

    Lyu S S, Cai Y Y, He W J, et al. Method of using RE-AIM framework to develop implementation outcome indicators[J]. Chin J Evid-based Med, 2023, 23(6): 695-701. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZXZ202306012.htm
    [16]
    Wang Y X, Wong E L Y, Nilsen P, et al. A scoping review of implementation science theories, models, and frameworks-an appraisal of purpose, characteristics, usability, applicability, and testability[J]. Implement Sci, 2023, 18(1): 43. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01296-x
    [17]
    Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks[J]. Implement Sci, 2015, 10: 53. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0
    [18]
    Chibanda D, Mesu P, Kajawu L, et al. Problem-solving therapy for depression and common mental disorders in Zimbabwe: piloting a task-shifting primary mental health care intervention in a population with a high prevalence of people living with HIV[J]. BMC Public Health, 2011, 11: 828. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-828
    [19]
    Hemming K, Haines T P, Chilton P J, et al. The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting[J]. BMJ, 2015, 350: h391. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h391
    [20]
    Collins L M, Nahum-Shani I, Almirall D. Optimization of behavioral dynamic treatment regimens based on the sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART)[J]. Clin Trials, 2014, 11(4): 426-434. DOI: 10.1177/1740774514536795
    [21]
    Collins L M, Murphy S A, Nair V N, et al. A strategy for optimizing and evaluating behavioral interventions[J]. Ann Behav Med, 2005, 30(1): 65-73. DOI: 10.1207/s15324796abm3001_8
    [22]
    Mody A, Filiatreau L M, Goss C W, et al. Instrumental variables for implementation science: exploring context-depend-ent causal pathways between implementation strategies and evidence-based interventions[J]. Implement Sci Commun, 2023, 4(1): 157. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00536-x
    [23]
    Dang A. Real-world evidence: a primer[J]. Pharmaceut Med, 2023, 37(1): 25-36.
    [24]
    Palinkas L A, Aarons G A, Horwitz S, et al. Mixed method designs in implementation research[J]. Adm Policy Ment Health, 2011, 38(1): 44-53. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-010-0314-z
    [25]
    Nevedal A L, Reardon C M, Opra Widerquist M A, et al. Rapid versus traditional qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)[J]. Implement Sci, 2021, 16(1): 67. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01111-5
    [26]
    Palinkas L A, Zatzick D. Rapid assessment procedure informed clinical ethnography (RAPICE) in pragmatic clinical trials of mental health services implementation: methods and applied case study[J]. Adm Policy Ment Health, 2019, 46(2): 255-270. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-018-0909-3
    [27]
    Salloum R G, Shenkman E A, Louviere J J, et al. Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engage-ment as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review[J]. Implement Sci, 2017, 12(1): 140. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0675-8
    [28]
    Salloum R G, Bishop J R, Elchynski A L, et al. Best-worst scaling methodology to evaluate constructs of the Consoli-dated Framework for Implementation Research: application to the implementation of pharmacogenetic testing for antidepressant therapy[J]. Implement Sci Commun, 2022, 3(1): 52. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00300-7
    [29]
    Sheldrick R C, Cruden G, Schaefer A J, et al. Rapid-cycle systems modeling to support evidence-informed decision-making during system-wide implementation[J]. Implement Sci Commun, 2021, 2(1): 116. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00218-6
    [30]
    De Oliveira C, Matias M A, Jacobs R. Microsimulation models on mental health: a critical review of the literature[J]. Value Health, 2024, 27(2): 226-246.
    [31]
    The Lancet Global Health. Implementing implementation science in global health[J]. Lancet Glob Health, 2023, 11(12): e1827.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(28)

    1. 李妍,韩彤昕,毛华伟. 线上与线下医学人文教学结合应用的研究与探索. 中国继续医学教育. 2025(01): 185-188 .
    2. 李研,赵琳琳. 英美医学教育中戏剧元素的人文透视. 中国医学伦理学. 2025(03): 385-391 .
    3. 张慧颖,王锦帆,马宇昊,何源. 新时代中国医学人文研究热点及趋势探析. 中国医学伦理学. 2025(03): 336-345 .
    4. 王红宇,刘金强,丁俊杰,王红,孟志剑,唐聚花,张思森. 医患沟通技能培训在急重症医学住院医生规培中的应用. 中国现代医生. 2024(02): 74-76 .
    5. 向琳,王浩辰,黄天宇,何鲲. 基于“医教研德”复合型人才培养模式口腔种植学教学改革思考与探索. 中国医药导报. 2024(04): 70-73 .
    6. 俞婧,王瑞,武云. 基于VOSviewer的我国叙事医学相关文献的可视化分析及启示. 中国毕业后医学教育. 2024(03): 207-213 .
    7. 余航,安琪,金李,吴远,陈涛,肖懿慧. BOPPPS教学模式融合课程思政在本科生内科学见习中的应用. 医学教育研究与实践. 2024(03): 349-354 .
    8. 周殷华,程瑜,崔昌杰,田晓辉,符隆文,方婵,廖晓星,陈起坤. 医文融合视域下临床医学人文教学体系研究. 中国医学伦理学. 2024(07): 860-866 .
    9. 王京,贺欢欣,董智瑞,董健,赵明东. 住培医师人文素养的培育. 中国继续医学教育. 2024(20): 186-189 .
    10. 敖玲敏,沈菊. 中华优秀传统文化融入大学生心理健康教育的价值之维与实践之路. 黑龙江高教研究. 2024(12): 120-126 .
    11. 王倩,巩红,刘昌,李雁,李研,辛娟,张月浪. 以临床人文岗位胜任力为导向的医学人文多元教育渠道的探索. 医学教育研究与实践. 2023(01): 68-72 .
    12. 徐燕玲,顾漪. 临床医师医学人文认知现状调查. 中国现代医生. 2023(05): 135-138 .
    13. 冯悦,庞维,郑丽,李胜军,孙逊,冯辉. 新医科和新文科交叉融合对免疫学创新人才培养的探索性改革. 中国免疫学杂志. 2023(06): 1203-1206 .
    14. 柳舟,张亮,王璐,朱睿瑶,王慧娟,张静,雷佳羲,詹丽英. 重症医学科医学人文素质教育的改革与实践. 中国继续医学教育. 2023(12): 10-14 .
    15. 阳磊,彭蓓,张婉丽. 口腔科住院医师规范化培训医学人文教育改革实践. 经济研究导刊. 2023(12): 123-125 .
    16. 赵娟,徐斌. 进修医师自身免疫性肝炎临床带教体会. 继续医学教育. 2023(06): 129-132 .
    17. 刘琴,何自强,骆佳佳,冯凯娜. 以提升人文关怀能力为导向的护理学导论教学模式应用研究. 沈阳医学院学报. 2023(05): 540-543 .
    18. 谢佳君,何勇涛,黄国琼,秦宇彤,王方芳,栗昕,黄春基. 立德树人背景下医学生德育素质培养研究. 中国社会医学杂志. 2023(05): 540-543 .
    19. 吕晓龙,严旭,章涵. 以强化人文素养为导向的全科医学生叙事医学课程模式构建. 济源职业技术学院学报. 2023(04): 33-37 .
    20. 吕少春,宋汉君,栾海艳,何穆涵. 基于医学模拟教学的医学生临床能力培养研究. 医学教育研究与实践. 2022(03): 294-297 .
    21. 李超. 培养高素质临床医生路径分析. 继续医学教育. 2022(04): 61-64 .
    22. 冯矗,陈飞,张树霞,刘古月,李晓宇. 医学人文关怀教育融入外科实习的实践探索. 中医药管理杂志. 2022(11): 88-90 .
    23. 高铭,韩涛,池靖涵,杜振兰,杨常栓,侯豫,花少栋. 创新互动式医学人文教育在儿科住院医师规范化培训中的作用研究. 中国医学伦理学. 2022(07): 806-810 .
    24. 胡艳超,王洪涛,王怡雯,周戬平. 医学人文教育在心血管内科混合式教学中的应用. 医学教育研究与实践. 2022(05): 648-652 .
    25. 叶榆莹. 英语电影字幕翻译对医学生人文教育的作用探究. 才智. 2022(33): 62-65 .
    26. 陶庆才. 抗疫精神融入医学院校课程思政的研究与实践. 浙江医学教育. 2022(05): 268-270+299 .
    27. 张宏伟,熊梓彤,林芷伊. 英国医学人文关怀及其医学教育启示. 农垦医学. 2022(06): 561-564 .
    28. 祝贺,敖俊红,杨蓉娅,李海涛. 全媒体时代医学摄影的边界教育在皮肤病与性病科临床教学中的意义. 实用皮肤病学杂志. 2022(06): 367-369 .

    Other cited types(6)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (971) PDF downloads (378) Cited by(34)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return
    x Close Forever Close