Electricity Pricing with Continuous-time Commodity Model and Non-monotonic Load Curve
), Abstract
Under the “carbon peak and carbon neutrality” background, clean energy enters the market on a large scale, so it is very important to study the pricing theory of electricity. The bright spot of this paper is that the load curve is more practical. In the original version of electricity pricing theory based on continuous time commodity model, the load curve is supposed to be a monotonic function with time for simplicity of derivation, which is not realistic. To overcome this defect, load curves are supposed to be in shapes of a unimodal model and multimodal cases in this paper, which are more in conformity with the actual load curve in real-world power markets. Two study cases are used to demonstrate the rationality of the proposed models. These results together with the authors’ previous work provide a complete pricing scheme for continuous-time electricity commodity model.
References
H. Zheng, “Fully implement ecological civilization to ensure carbon neutral targets are reached on schedule,” Environmental Science, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1, 2021.
X. B. Pan and Y. F. Huang, “On the presentation and realization of Chi-nas carbon-neutral Vision,” Resources Economization & Environmental Protection, no. 9, pp. 126–127, 2021.
R. Liu, “Gulf states are scrambling for hydrogen energy,” New Energy Technology, no. 9, pp. 28, Sep. 2021.
H. Y. Chen, “Electricity value analysis and market mechanism design under carbon-neutral goal,” Power Generation Technology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 141–150, Apr. 2021.
L. Shi, “The revelation of foreign power market–preliminary discussion of the construction of kunming power market,” Power Demand Side Management, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 58–60, Jun. 2003.
S. M. Sun, D. X. Chi, B. Yu, and M. Y. Zhou, “Build a new-type electric market system and an electric pricing mechanism,” Macroeconomic Management, no. 3, pp. 71–77, Mar. 2021.
H. R. Zhao and L. W. Fu, “ A study on power price formation mechanism of clean energy in foreign countries,” Journal of North China Electric Power University: Social Sciences, no. 4, pp. 7–13, Aug. 2011.
G. Zhang, Y. Yan, K. S. Zhang, P. L. Li, M. Li, Q. He, and H. L. Chao, “Time-of-use Pricing Model Considering Wind Power Uncertainty,” CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1039–1047, Jul. 2022.
L. T. Zheng, J. X. Wang, Y. Yu, G. Y. Li, M. Zhou, Q. Xia, and G. Z. Xu, “On the Consistency of Renewable-to-Hydrogen Pricing,” CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 392–402, Mar. 2022.
Y. S. Feng and Y. M. Zhou, “Construction of carbon market and electricity market under dual carbon target,” Finance and Economics Think Tank, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 102–123, 143–144, Jul. 2021.
S. B. Feng, “How to deepen the reform of energy system during the 14th five-year plan period,” China Policy Review, no. 4, pp. 28–29, Jul. 2021.
M. C. Caramanis, R. E. Bohn, and F. C. Schweppe, “Optimal spot pricing: practice and theory,” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-101, no. 9, pp. 3234–3245, Sep. 1982.
W. Elmaghraby and S. S. Oren, “The efficiency of multi-unit electricity auctions,” The Energy Journal, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 89–116, Oct. 1999.
X. F. Wang, Block bidding model based power market,” Proceedings of the CSEE, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1–6, Dec. 2001.
J. D. Velásquez and C. J. Franco, “Continuous time series models for modeling daily electricity prices,” IEEE Latin America Transactions, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 3630–3635, Aug. 2016.
H. Y. Chen and L. J. Han, “Electricity pricing theory based on continuous time commodity model,” Scientia Sinica Informationis, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1287–1299, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1360/N112018-00061.
Department of East China Normal University Mathematics, Mathematical Analysis, 4th ed, Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2010.
Y. P. Wang, Y. M. Xia, J. B. Shi, and L. Chen, Lebesgue Measure and Integral, FD: Southeast University Press, 2017.
京公网安备11010802044758号