PDF (1.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Original Article | Open Access

Prediction of death rates for cardiovascular diseases and cancers

Oleg Gaidai1Yihan Xing2()Rajiv Balakrishna2Jiayao Sun3Xiaolong Bai3
Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Marine Renewable Energy, College of Engineering Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China
Department of Mechanical and Structural Engineering and Materials Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
School of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

To estimate cardiovascular and cancer death rates by regions and time periods.

Design

Novel statistical methods were used to analyze clinical surveillance data.

Methods

A multicenter, population‐based medical survey was performed. Annual recorded deaths from cardiovascular diseases were analyzed for all 195 countries of the world. It is challenging to model such data; few mathematical models can be applied because cardiovascular disease and cancer data are generally not normally distributed.

Results

A novel approach to assessing the biosystem reliability is introduced and has been found to be particularly suitable for analyzing multiregion environmental and healthcare systems. While traditional methods for analyzing temporal observations of multiregion processes do not deal with dimensionality efficiently, our methodology has been shown to be able to cope with this challenge.

Conclusions

Our novel methodology can be applied to public health and clinical survey data.

References

1

Cox B, Vangronsveld J, Nawrot TS. Impact of stepwise introduction of smokefree legislation on population rates of acute myocardial infarction deaths in Flanders, Belgium. Heart. 2014; 100(18): 1430–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305613

2

Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Alonso A, Beaton AZ, Bittencourt MS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2022 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;145(8): e153–639. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052

3

Smolina K, Wright FL, Rayner M, Goldacre MJ. Determinants of the decline in mortality from acute myocardial infarction in England between 2002 and 2010: linked national database study. BMJ. 2012;344: d8059. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d8059

4

Balakrishna R, Bjørnerud T, Bemanian M, Aune D, Fadnes LT. Consumption of nuts and seeds and health outcomes including cardiovascular disease, diabetes and metabolic disease, cancer, and mortality: an umbrella review. Adv Nutr. 2022;13(6): 2136–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmac077

5

Mackay DF, Irfan MO, Haw S, Pell JP. Meta‐analysis of the effect of comprehensive smoke‐free legislation on acute coronary events. Heart. 2010;96(19): 1525–30. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2010.199026

6

Alzuhairi KS, Søgaard P, Ravkilde J, Gislason G, Køber L, Torp‐Pedersen C. Incidence and outcome of first myocardial infarction according to gender and age in Denmark over a 35‐year period (1978–2012). Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2015;1(2): 72–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcv016

7

Mirzaei M, Truswell AS, Taylor R, Leeder SR. Coronary heart disease epidemics: not all the same. Heart. 2009;95: 740–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2008.154856

8

NCDRF Collaboration. Trends in adult body‐mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population‐based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387(10026): 1377–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30054-X

9

Siegel R, Miller K, Fuchs H, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1): 7–33. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21708

10
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. SEER*Stat Database: North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) Incidence Data—Cancer in North America Analytic File, 1995–2018, With Race/Ethnicity, Custom File With County, American Cancer Society Facts and Figures Projection Project (which includes data from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries, the Canadian Council of Cancer Registries' Provincial and Territorial Registries, and the National Cancer Institute's SEER Registries, certified by the NAACCR as meeting high‐quality incidence data standards for the specified time periods). National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program; Atlanta, Georgia, 2021.
11
Sherman R, Firth R, Charlton M, De P, Prithwish D, Green D, et al., editors. Cancer in North America: 2014–2018. Volume two: registry‐specific cancer incidence in the United States and Canada. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries Inc.; Springfield, Illinois, 2021.
12
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. SEER*Stat Database: mortality—all causes of death, total U.S. (1969–2019)—Katrina/Rita population adjustment—linked to county attributes—total U.S., 1969–2019 Counties (underlying mortality data provided by the National Center for Health Statistics). Springfield, Illinois: National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program; 2021.
13

Wingo PA, Cardinez CJ, Landis SH, Greenlee RT, Ries LAG, Anderson RN, et al. Long‐term trends in cancer mortality in the United States, 1930–1998. Cancer. 2003;97(12 suppl): 3133–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11380

14
Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin L, Parkin DM, et al., editors. International classification of diseases for oncology. 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2000.
15
World Health Organization (WHO). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th revision. Vol. Ⅰ‐Ⅲ. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2011.
16
Surveillance Research Program. SEER*Stat software, version 8.3.8. Bethesda, Maryland: National Cancer Institute; 2020.
17
Surveillance Research Program. Joinpoint Regression Program version 4.9.0.1. Bethesda, Maryland: National Cancer Institute, Statistical Research and Applications Branch; 2021.
18

Mariotto AB, Zou Z, Johnson CJ, Scoppa S, Weir HK, Huang B. Geographical, racial and socio‐economic variation in life expectancy in the US and their impact on cancer relative survival. PLoS One. 2018;13(7): e0201034. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201034

19

Clegg LX, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN, Fay MP, Hankey BF. Impact of reporting delay and reporting error on cancer incidence rates and trends. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(20): 1537–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/94.20.1537

20

Yabroff KR, Wu XC, Negoita S, Stevens J, Coyle L, Zhao J, et al. Association of the COVID‐19 pandemic with patterns of statewide cancer services. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021;114(6): 907–9.

21
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. SEER*Stat Database: incidence—SEER 9 registries research data with delay—adjustment, malignant only, November 2020 submission (1975–2018)—Katrina/Rita population adjustment—linked to county attributes—total U.S., 1969–2018 counties. Bethesda, Maryland: National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch; 2021.
22
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. SEER*Stat Database: incidence—SEER 18 registries research data + Hurricane Katrina impacted Louisiana cases, November 2020 submission (2000–2018)—Katrina/Rita population adjustment—linked to county attributes—total U.S., 1969–2018 counties. Bethesda, Maryland: National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch; 2021.
23
Surveillance Research Program. SEER*Explorer: an interactive website for SEER cancer statistics. Bethesda, Maryland: National Cancer Institute; 2021. https://seer.cancer.gov/explorer/. Accessed 15 April 2021.
24
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. SEER*Stat Database: incidence—SEER research limited— field data with delay—adjustment, 21 registries, malignant only, November 2020 submission (2000–2018)—linked to county attributes—time dependent (1990–2018) income/rurality, 1969–2019 counties. Bethesda, Maryland: National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program; 2021.
25
Surveillance Research Program, Statistic Methodology and Applications. DevCan: probability of developing or dying of cancer software. Version 6.7.9. Bethesda, Maryland: National Cancer Institute; 2021.
26
Murphy SL, Kochanek KD, Xu J, Heron M. Deaths: final data for 2012. National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 63, No. 9. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics; 2015.
27

Steliarova‐Foucher E, Stiller C, Lacour B, Kaatsch P. International classification of childhood cancer, third edition. Cancer. 2005;103(7): 1457–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20910

28

Gumbel E. Statistics of extremes. New York: Columbia University Press; 1958.

29
Sherman R, Firth R, Charlton M, De P, Green D, Hofer B, et al., editors. Cancer in North America: 2014–2018. Volume one: combined cancer incidence for the United States, Canada and North America. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries Inc.; 2021.
30
Ritchie H, Spooner F, Roser M. Causes of death. https://ourworldindata.org/causes-of-death
31
Choi S‐K, Grandhi RV, Canfield RA. Reliability‐based structural design. London: Springer‐Verlag; 2007.
32

Naess A, Gaidai O. Estimation of extreme values from sampled time series. Struct Saf. 2009;31(4): 325–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.021

33

Madsen HO, Krenk S, Lind NC. Methods of structural safety. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice‐Hall Inc.; 1986.

34

Ditlevsen O, Madsen HO. Structural reliability methods. Chichester (World): John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 1996.

35

Melchers RE. Structural reliability analysis and prediction. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 1999.

36

Xing Y, Gaidai O, Ma Y, Naess A, Wang F. A novel design approach for estimation of extreme responses of a subsea shuttle tanker hovering in ocean current considering aft thruster failure. Appl Ocean Res. 2022;123: 103179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2022.103179

37

Gaidai O, Wang F, Wu Y, Xing Y, Medina AR, Wang J. Offshore renewable energy site correlated wind‐wave statistics. Probabilistic Eng Mech. 2022;68: 103207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2022.103207

38

Xu X, Xing Y, Gaidai O, Wang K, Sandipkumar Patel K, Dou P, et al. A novel multi‐dimensional reliability approach for floating wind turbines under power production conditions. Front Marine Sci. 2022;9: 970081. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.970081

39

Sun J, Gaidai O, Wang F, Naess A, Wu Y, Xing Y, et al. Extreme riser experimental loads caused by sea currents in the Gulf of Eilat. Probabilistic Eng Mech. 2022;68: 103243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2022.103243

40

Xu X, Wang F, Gaidai O, Naess A, Xing Y, Wang J. Bivariate statistics of floating offshore wind turbine dynamic response under operational conditions. Ocean Eng. 2022;257: 111657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111657

41

Gaidai O, Xing Y, Wang F, Wang S, Yan P, Naess A. Improving extreme anchor tension prediction of a 10‐MW floating semi‐submersible type wind turbine, using highly correlated surge motion record. Front Mech Eng. 2022;8: 888497. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2022.888497

42

Gaidai O, Xing Y, Xu X. COVID‐19 epidemic forecast in USA East coast by novel reliability approach. Res Sq. 2022. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1573862/v1

43

Gaidai O, Xing Y, Balakrishna R. Improving extreme response prediction of a subsea shuttle tanker hovering in ocean current using an alternative highly correlated response signal. Results Eng. 2022;15: 100593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng. 2022.100593

44
Cheng Y, Gaidai O, Yurchenko D, Xu X, Gao S. The 32nd International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, paper number: ISOPE‐I‐22‐342, Shanghai, China. 2022.
45
Gaidai O, Storhaug G, Wang F, Yan P, Naess A, Wu Y, et al. On‐Board Trend Analysis for Cargo Vessel Hull Monitoring Systems. The 32nd International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, paper number: ISOPE‐I‐22‐541, Shanghai, China. 2022.
46

Gaidai O, Xu X, Naess A, Cheng Y, Ye R, Wang J. Bivariate statistics of wind farm support vessel motions while docking. Sh Offshore Struct. 2020;16(2): 135–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2019.1710936

47

Gaidai O, Fu S, Xing Y. Novel reliability method for multidimensional nonlinear dynamic systems. Mar Struct. 2022;86: 103278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2022.103278

48

Gaidai O, Xu J, Yan P, Xing Y, Wu Y, Zhang F. Novel methods for wind speeds prediction across multiple locations. Sci Rep. 2022;12: 19614. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24061-4

49

Naess A, Moan T. Stochastic dynamics of marine structures. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2013.

50

Gaidai O, Xing Y. A novel multi regional reliability method for COVID‐19 death forecast. Eng Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.30919/es8d799

51

Gaidai O, Yihan Y. A novel bio‐system reliability approach for multi‐state COVID‐19 epidemic forecast. Eng Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.30919/es8d797

52

Gaidai O, Yan P, Xing Y, Xu J, Wu Y. A novel statistical method for long‐term coronavirus modelling. F1000 Res. 2022;11: 1282.

Cancer Innovation
Pages 140-147
Cite this article:
Gaidai O, Xing Y, Balakrishna R, et al. Prediction of death rates for cardiovascular diseases and cancers. Cancer Innovation, 2023, 2(2): 140-147. https://doi.org/10.1002/cai2.47
Metrics & Citations  
Article History
Copyright
Rights and Permissions
Return