GONG Tan, SHANG Fei, TANG Xiaoying, HUO Li, LIU Shuai. Relationship Between Pharmacokinetic Parameters and Imaging Duration in Dynamic 11C-Acetate Cardiac PET/CT[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2023, 14(4): 758-765. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0121
Citation: GONG Tan, SHANG Fei, TANG Xiaoying, HUO Li, LIU Shuai. Relationship Between Pharmacokinetic Parameters and Imaging Duration in Dynamic 11C-Acetate Cardiac PET/CT[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2023, 14(4): 758-765. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0121

Relationship Between Pharmacokinetic Parameters and Imaging Duration in Dynamic 11C-Acetate Cardiac PET/CT

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82102136

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    LIU Shuai, E-mail: liushuai@bit.edu.cn

  • Received Date: March 09, 2023
  • Accepted Date: April 19, 2023
  • Issue Publish Date: July 29, 2023
  •   Objective  To evaluate the effect of imaging time on the pharmacokinetic parameters calculation of dynamic 11C-acetate cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) scan and to investigate the feasibility of shortening the imaging time in clinical practice.
      Methods  This study was a retrospective analysis and 46 subjects who underwent 11C-acetate PET/CT cardiac imaging at Peking Union Medical College Hospital (from a clinical study assessing myocardial tissue and metabolic characteristics in men with alcohol consumption) were included. Each subject was injected with 740 MBq 11C-acetate before a 40-minute PET/CT scan, and time-activity curve in the left ventricle was collected as input function. Pharmacokinetic parameters (K1 and k2) calculated from the 40-minute dynamic data (53 frames) was regarded as the reference standard. The number of included dynamic image frames was sequentially reduced from the last frame, and the corresponding pharmacokinetic parameters of 11C-acetate were calculated. Correlation, consistent analysis of trends and the relative differences on pharmacokinetic parameters between shortened data and reference standard were evaluated. The shortest acceptable scan time was determined based on the criterion that the R2 of linear regression models was higher than 0.9 in all myocardial segments.
      Results  The R2 between 11C-acetate pharmacokinetic parameters and the reference standard was higher than 0.9 in all myocardial segments at scan time ≥17 min (37 frames) for both K1 and k2. The regression coefficients of K1 values calculated from the shortened data and the reference standard in myocardium were distributed in the range of 0.982-1.007, and the regression coefficients of k2 values calculated from the shortened data and the reference standard were distributed in the range of 0.783-1.000. When the scan time was reduced to 17 min (37 frames), the K1 and k2 values of left anterior descending branch, right coronary artery and left circumflex branch perfusion regions were significantly different from the reference standard (all P < 0.05). Left anterior descending branch perfusion region had the highest relative difference (RD) [K1: (3.93±1.98)%; k2: (13.79±6.40)%], while right coronary perfusion region had the lowest RD [K1: (2.84±1.89)%; k2: (9.74±5.62)%].
      Conclusions  For the male population with alcohol consumption or are healthy, shortening the scan time to 17 min (37 frames) during dynamic 11C-acetate PET/CT cardiac imaging can obtain tracer pharmacokinetic parameters consistent with the reference standard, which can provide references for optimizing clinical image acquisition time.
  • [1]
    Lindner O, Sorensen J, Vogt J, et al. Cardiac efficiency and oxygen consumption measured with 11C-acetate PET after long-term cardiac resynchronization therapy[J]. J Nucl Med, 2006, 47: 378-383.
    [2]
    Sorensen J, Valind S, Andersson LG. Simultaneous quantification of myocardial perfusion, oxidative metabolism, cardiac efficiency and pump function at rest and during supine bicycle exercise using 11C-acetate PET - a pilot study[J]. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging, 2010, 30: 279-284. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2010.00938.x
    [3]
    Liu S, Lin X, Shi X, et al. Myocardial tissue and metabolism characterization in men with alcohol consumption by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and 11C-acetate PET/CT[J]. J Cardiovasc Magn R, 2020, 22: 23. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-020-00614-2
    [4]
    Ukkonen H, Knuuti J, Katoh C, et al. Use of [11 C] acetate and [15 O] O2 PET for the assessment of myocardial oxygen utilization in patients with chronic myocardial infarction[J]. Eur J Nucl Med, 2001, 28: 334-339. DOI: 10.1007/s002590000444
    [5]
    Nesterov SV, Turta O, Han C, et al. 11C acetate has excellent reproducibility for quantification of myocardial oxidative metabolism[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2015, 16: 500-506. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu289
    [6]
    Torizuka T, Nobezawa S, Momiki S, et al. Short dynamic FDG-PET imaging protocol for patients with lung cancer[J]. Eur J Nucl Med, 2000, 27: 1538-1542. DOI: 10.1007/s002590000312
    [7]
    Visser EP, Kienhorst L, Geus-Oei L, et al. Shortened dynamic FDG-PET protocol to determine the glucose metabolic rate in non-small cell lung carcinoma[C]. 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. IEEE, 2008: 4455-4458.
    [8]
    Monden T, Kudomi N, Sasakawa Y, et al. Shortening the duration of [18 F] FDG PET brain examination for diagnosis of brain glioma[J]. Mol Imaging Biol, 2011, 13: 754-758. DOI: 10.1007/s11307-010-0384-z
    [9]
    Liu G, Yu H, Shi D, et al. Short-time total-body dynamic PET imaging performance in quantifying the kinetic metrics of 18F-FDG in healthy volunteers[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2022, 49: 2493-2503. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05500-2
    [10]
    Samimi R, Kamali-Asl A, Geramifar P, et al. Short-duration dynamic FDG PET imaging: optimization and clinical application[J]. Phys Med, 2020, 80: 193-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.11.004
    [11]
    Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association[J]. Circulation, 2002, 105: 539-542. DOI: 10.1161/hc0402.102975
    [12]
    何升级, 刘帅, 张辉, 等. 基于交替方向乘子法(ADMM)直接重建心脏11C-acetate PET动力学参数图[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2022, 38: 758-763. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYXX202205029.htm
    [13]
    Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Strauss LG, Heichel T, et al. The role of quantitative (18)F-FDG PET studies for the differentiation of malignant and benign bone lesions[J]. J Nucl Med, 2002, 43: 510-518.
    [14]
    Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Strauss LG, Schwarzbach M, et al. Dynamic PET 18F-FDG studies in patients with primary and recurrent soft-tissue sarcomas: impact on diagnosis and correlation with grading[J]. J Nucl Med, 2001, 42: 713-720.
    [15]
    Rusten E, Rodal J, Revheim ME, et al. Quantitative dynamic (18)FDG-PET and tracer kinetic analysis of soft tissue sarcomas[J]. Acta Oncol, 2013, 52: 1160-1167. DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.728713
    [16]
    Strauss LG, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Koczan D, et al. 18F-FDG kinetics and gene expression in giant cell tumors[J]. J Nucl Med, 2004, 45: 1528-1535.
    [17]
    Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Hohenberger P, Pan L, et al. Dynamic PET with FDG in patients with unresectable aggressive fibromatosis: regression-based parametric images and correlation to the FDG kinetics based on a 2-tissue compartment model[J]. Clin Nucl Med, 2012, 37: 943-948. DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31825b1da4
    [18]
    Humbert O, Lasserre M, Bertaut A, et al. Breast cancer blood flow and metabolism on dual-acquisition (18)F-FDG PET: correlation with tumor phenotype and neoadjuvant chemotherapy response[J]. J Nucl Med, 2018, 59: 1035-1041. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.203075
    [19]
    Ye Q, Wu J, Lu Y, et al. Improved discrimination between benign and malignant LDCT screening-detected lung nodules with dynamic over static 18F-FDG PET as a function of injected dose[J]. Phys Med Biol, 2018, 63: 175015. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aad97f
    [20]
    Nishiyama Y, Yamamoto Y, Monden T, et al. Diagnostic value of kinetic analysis using dynamic FDG PET in immunocompetent patients with primary CNS lymphoma[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2007, 34: 78-86. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-006-0153-z
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHANG Ning, RUAN Gechong, JIAO Yang, LIU Xiaoqing, Jonathan Lio, KANG Lin. Research Hotspots and Trends of Growth Mindset in Medical Education: A Bibliometric Analysis[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0796
    [2]JIANG Wenli, HUANG Tian, WANG Furui, ZHOU Guangbo, ZHENG Ya, WANG Yuping, HU Zenan. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Relationship Between Oral Microbiome and Digestive System Diseases[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0877
    [3]ZHANG Ning, HE Mu, ZHANG Xiangyu, KANG Lin, SUN Xiaohong, LIU Xiaohong, QU Xuan, ZHU Minglei. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Development of Global Research on Geriatric Interdisciplinary Team From 2000 to 2023[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(5): 1107-1116. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0180
    [4]SUN Jianhua, LUO Hongbo, LI Zunzhu, LU Meishan, LIAN Hui, WANG Xiaoting, Critical Care Ultrasound Study Group. Cognition and Practice of Doctor-Nurse Integration Construction in the Department of Critical Care Medicine[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(3): 518-521. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0116
    [5]SHI Xiuqing, YAN Siyu, HUANG Qiao, LI Xuhui, WANG Yongbo, MA Wenhao, SHANG Hongcai, JIN Yinghui. Real World Research: Bridging the Gap Between Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Decision Making[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2023, 14(4): 859-867. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2022-0217
    [6]LIU Yuan, ZHAO Lin. Update and Interpretation of 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(6): 999-1004. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2022-0271
    [7]SHI Jiyuan, TIAN Jinhui, GAO Ya, XU Jian'guo, LI Zheng. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Global Research Output on Artificial Intelligence Clinical Research[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(5): 871-879. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2021-0746
    [8]XU Haojie, WANG Lu, LIU Mingjuan, ZHAO Lidan. Analysis of Integrating Training in Scientific Research and Clinical Practice among Current Medical Postgraduates of Three Academic Systems[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(1): 66-73. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2021-0623
    [9]Li-fan ZHANG, Xiao-qing LIU. Study Design and Clinical Practice of Diagnostic Accucary Test[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2020, 11(1): 96-101. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.20190276
    [10]Yao-long CHEN, Hong-cai SHANG, Ke-hu YANG, Chen WANG. International Experience and China's Route in Clinical Practice Guidelines[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2019, 10(3): 289-292. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2019.03.018

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return
    x Close Forever Close